modernity, i think could be compared to the growth of character in an individual like Billy (the guy with red hair) [society] from one flew over the cuckoo's nest - he is a quiet and controlled individual who does not question anything. he keeps his head down. but when he is exposed to Randle (jack nicolson) [industry] he becomes a new, seemingly more healthy and "normal" individual. sadly this new found strength of character does not serve him well and he ends up killing himself. whether that part is in any relation to the analogy of modernity that i am trying to create, i don't know.
i am aware that it is quite a strange and possibly nonsensical analogy but what i am trying to question is whether modernity is a healthy or unhealthy phenomenon. i am also aware that psychology is a product of modernity and the worry that people had about the effect that this rapidly evolving society would have on the mind. whatever the answer may be, it certainly made for some good cinema! the interior design and decoration is also quite modernistic, so to speak, - function over form like iv never seen before!
moving away from suicide, lobotomy's and good cinema, we have this beautiful Degas "the absinthe drinker". Absinthe, ironically, was banned from mainland Europe because it was felt that it was leading to a demise in society. i think it is still illegal in the UK to this day actually. im not sure though. But the painting - depicting a woman in a a very human, honest state. i believe, was a very revolutionary piece of work, as it questions such ideals as monogamy, and in turn the church. which gives rise to another factor of modernity - the shift in power from the church/religion to government. but to address the painting at hand the image of this pretty young woman, looking quite unhappy, or even depressed, sat next to an older, uninterested and in my eyes, less attractive man. the woman looks somewhat uncomfortable as well, her bach is hunched her shoulders stiff, her hands are at her sides and her chin is down. the alcohol on the table is sat there like some sort of medication, to cure her discontent with the society that she lives in, or at least to make the night that is about to unfold a little more bearable!
graphic design vs. fine art: graphic design, in my mind, is analytical and based on common sense rather than being conceptual and expressive. a painting or sculpture does not have to sell anything other than an idea perhaps. while graphic design is solely built to sell things like paintings and sculptures strangely. however certain pieces of graphic design were, and still are considered to be art forms for example this cigarette advert by Alphonse Mucha is ART Nouveau.
"weapons of mass communication"
both images have a propaganda like underlying themes. well the lumley obviously is a propaganda poster
Daddy, what did you do in the Great War? poster by Savile Lumley (1915)
The Uncle Sam Range (1876) Advertising Image by Schumacher & Ettlinger, New York
Saturday, 13 November 2010
Friday, 5 November 2010
contextual studies: modernism/thoughts
modernism: 1960 - onward.
1960 = uncomfortable bras, revolutionary music (pop), Drugs, drug culture, equal rights, colour, hair styles, bellbottoms/flares. protesting, hippies, Vietnam, drugs.
people grew vocal chords, so to speak... that doesn't read right. the public became very vocal about government actions eg. vietnam war. rebellion in western culture is now cool. student-organized protests.
perhaps farm-ville is such a popular game because it is touching (very faintly) on the sort of lives that we should be living.
1960 = uncomfortable bras, revolutionary music (pop), Drugs, drug culture, equal rights, colour, hair styles, bellbottoms/flares. protesting, hippies, Vietnam, drugs.
people grew vocal chords, so to speak... that doesn't read right. the public became very vocal about government actions eg. vietnam war. rebellion in western culture is now cool. student-organized protests.
perhaps farm-ville is such a popular game because it is touching (very faintly) on the sort of lives that we should be living.
contextual studies: lecture 1
notes: modernity - 1750-1960 aprox. things start to change, naturally enough. in the painting of the shepherd being distracted by a woman as his flock eat the corn, the painter (?) depicts man as a lusty, imperfect and almost foolish subject. it is also erotic as the shepherd is grouping a young lady!
shopping becomes a leisure activity
world time was introduced/regulated because of transport
'THE CITY' is the figure/symbol of modernity
strolling around the streets becomes a leisure activity
http://s157.photobucket.com/albums/t68/earthly-paradise/?action=view¤t=hirelingshepherd.jpg
thats a link for the sheep painting. its by William Holmen Hunt, "hireling shepherd"
notice that the man also has curly hair like a sheep. he looks a little bit sheepish you might say!
iv noticed that the woman is also trying to resist his sheepish charm - maybe she is self conscious because all of the sheep are watching them. perhaps because they did not live in a modernist society this would affect the way they thought about the situation - sex in a public place. although its just in front of sheep... or maybe she just wasn't diggin his hair-do?
the main thing that confuses me about the painting is that it is obviously set in spring, hence the lambs, blossom, fair weather and full woolen coats on the livestock, yet the 'naughty sheep' is eating corn! you dont get a crop of corn until late summer! so did this event actually take place? no. only in William Holmen Hunt's mind. well the corn part anyway - which is a key feature to the message behind the painting, apparently.
shopping becomes a leisure activity
world time was introduced/regulated because of transport
'THE CITY' is the figure/symbol of modernity
strolling around the streets becomes a leisure activity
http://s157.photobucket.com/albums/t68/earthly-paradise/?action=view¤t=hirelingshepherd.jpg
thats a link for the sheep painting. its by William Holmen Hunt, "hireling shepherd"
notice that the man also has curly hair like a sheep. he looks a little bit sheepish you might say!
iv noticed that the woman is also trying to resist his sheepish charm - maybe she is self conscious because all of the sheep are watching them. perhaps because they did not live in a modernist society this would affect the way they thought about the situation - sex in a public place. although its just in front of sheep... or maybe she just wasn't diggin his hair-do?
the main thing that confuses me about the painting is that it is obviously set in spring, hence the lambs, blossom, fair weather and full woolen coats on the livestock, yet the 'naughty sheep' is eating corn! you dont get a crop of corn until late summer! so did this event actually take place? no. only in William Holmen Hunt's mind. well the corn part anyway - which is a key feature to the message behind the painting, apparently.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)